arrow_back Back to My Works

Portfolio / Case Studies / Barry Callebaut Digital Twin

Digital Twin & AI
Manufacturing Simulator

An enterprise Digital Twin platform designed to simulate factory operations, optimize chocolate throughput, and predict quality deviations across global facilities before real-world deployment.

Client
Barry Callebaut
Role
Product Designer
Engagement
Enterprise AI Simulator
Platform
React Web Application
Global Watch Tower — Enterprise Status Overview
SYSTEM CALIBRATED
Watch Tower
Tempering Lines
Simulator Hub
Governance

Global Facilities Telemetry Sync

5 / 5 PLANTS ACTIVE
OEE: 88.4%
Ghent Plant — Line 3 Tempering Deviation ALERT: 35.5°C
Zurich Plant — Conching Efficiency OPTIMAL

01 — Project Overview

Enterprise Digital Twin
Manufacturing Platform

Barry Callebaut operates one of the world's largest chocolate manufacturing networks, producing thousands of tons of chocolate products across multiple factories worldwide.

Manufacturing operations involve hundreds of production parameters—including ingredient ratios, equipment utilization, production schedules, machine temperatures, throughput targets, quality checkpoints, and logistics constraints. Production planners and quality teams often need to answer complex "what-if" scenarios before executing changes on the factory floor.

"Traditional planning methods relied heavily on spreadsheets, disconnected manufacturing systems, manual calculations, and delayed reporting. This made production planning reactive instead of predictive."

The goal of this project was to design an enterprise Digital Twin platform capable of simulating factory operations before changes were deployed in the real world. The platform combined real-time production monitoring, predictive simulations, AI-assisted recommendations, and governance workflows into a single unified experience.

02 — Business Context

Balancing Trade-offs in
Chocolate Production

Manufacturing organizations generate enormous volumes of operational data every minute. However, data alone does not enable better decisions. Production planners constantly balance competing priorities:

Volume vs Packaging
Increasing production volume might overload downstream packaging lines.
Heat vs Consistency
Changing temperatures may improve throughput but negatively impact chocolate quality.
Multi-Plant Allocation
Shifting production between global factories to meet localized demand spikes may increase transport costs.

03 — Problem Statement

The Reactive Planning
Bottleneck

Planners and QC teams faced mounting pressure to maintain high throughput and product quality under volatile real-time conditions. Without simulation tools, predicting downstream consequences of a line adjustment or demand spike took hours or days of manual calculation.

04 — Strategic Objectives

Primary Goals

Optimize Factory Throughput
Allow planners to simulate production changes and evaluate impact on throughput and cost.
Improve Product Quality
Enable quality teams to monitor critical parameters in real time and detect deviations.
Global Visibility
Create a centralized Watch Tower to monitor every facility through standardized KPIs.
Strengthen Governance
Introduce structured approval workflows, simulation history, and audit trails.

05 — Success Metrics

Measured Outcomes

1
Unified Console
Eliminated multiple spreadsheet dependency loops.
0%
Audit Traceability
Strengthened manufacturing governance compliance.
< 0 min
Scenario Generation
Planners generate and compare what-if runs in minutes.

06 — Responsibilities

My Design Role

As the Product Designer, I owned the end-to-end user experience for the Digital Twin platform:

UX Research
Info Architecture
Workflow Design
Hi-Fi UI Prototypes

07 — Target Users

User Personas

Production Planners

Increase throughput, balance production load, and allocate resources efficiently across factory lines.

Quality Controllers

Maintain product consistency, detect quality deviations early, and prevent defective batches.

Operations Directors

Monitor global factory performance, evaluate risks, and optimize regional asset utilization.

08 — Interactive Prototype

Barry Callebaut Chocolate
Factory Simulator

Adjust the tempering temperature and conching duration in the sidebar to run simulated Digital Twin projections.

DIGITAL TWIN SIMULATOR CONSOLE
REAL-TIME TELEMETRY
Parameters Console
Manufacturing Plant
Tempering Temp (°C)
32.0 °C
Conching Duration (Hours)
24.0 Hours
Preset Scenarios

Ghent Plant Simulation Output

SYSTEM STATUS: OPTIMAL
BATCH APPROVED
Throughput
31.2 t/h
Viscosity Index
2.4 Pa·s
Fat Bloom Risk
0.2%
AI Recommendation Engine

Current parameters are within optimal crystallization limits. Crystal type V formation is stable. No downstream packaging bottlenecks detected.

09 — Design System

Component Architecture

The platform leveraged a modular component library customized with Barry Callebaut brand aesthetics:

Telemetry Cards
Simulation Consoles
Alert Triage Banners

10 — Research & Discovery

User Research Methods

We conducted qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys with production planners and quality controllers across multiple European and North American facilities.

11 — Opportunity

The Opportunity Statement

"How might we transform complex manufacturing telemetry and simulation models into an intuitive decision-support tool that empowers plant managers to predict quality issues and optimize factory throughput before execution?"

12 — UX Design Principles

Core Design Principles

1. Visibility First
Surface critical KPIs, deviations, and operational summaries instantly without clutter.
2. Guided Decisions
Progressively walk users through monitoring, simulation, comparison, and approval workflows.
3. Explainable AI
Ensure AI recommendations are transparent, explainable, and backed by confidence metrics.

13 — Product Ecosystem

Information Architecture

The platform architecture is structured into three main layers:

Layer 1: Enterprise Overview

Global factory status, plant comparisons, and critical deviation alerts.

Layer 2: Operational Monitoring

Live production metrics, equipment health, line efficiency, and quality monitoring.

Layer 3: Decision Support

What-if simulations, AI-generated recommendations, and structured approvals.

14 — Design Decisions

Key Architectural Choices

Separation of Concerns

Separating Watch Tower monitoring from the active Simulator workspace to prevent cognitive overload.

Progressive Disclosure

Global View → Factory View → Machine View → Simulation Run → Approval Workflow.

15 — Technical Considerations

Performance & Governance

Engineered to handle high-frequency IoT sensor telemetry streams while maintaining a responsive, fluid user interface during complex simulation runs.

16 — Final Solution

Unified Manufacturing Hub

The final solution unified disparate manufacturing systems into an intelligent enterprise platform combining operational monitoring, predictive simulation, and AI-assisted planning within a single closed-loop ecosystem.

17 — Business Impact

Measured Outcomes

0%
Audit Traceability
Strengthened manufacturing governance compliance.
< 0 min
Scenario Generation
Planners generate and compare what-if runs in minutes.
0%
Prediction Accuracy
Validated against historical factory batch outcomes.

18 — Future Roadmap

Platform Expansion

Predictive Maintenance

Integrate machine health IoT sensors to forecast equipment failures before line downtime.

Sustainability Analytics

Monitor energy consumption, carbon emissions, and water efficiency across plants.

AI-Powered Scheduling

Automatically recommend optimized daily production schedules based on raw cocoa constraints.

19 — Reflections & Summary

Key Learnings

Working on the Barry Callebaut Digital Twin Platform reinforced that successful manufacturing products are built around decisions, not data. Trust in automated AI recommendations is earned through transparency and explainability.

Digital Twin Design Industrial IoT UX Explainable AI Scenario Planning Information Architecture Design Systems Enterprise SaaS
Next Case Study
Tru Fru Sales Dashboard →
← Return to All Works